World Court says Israel must allow UN aid to Gaza and ensure basic needs of Palestinians are met

THE HAGUE, Netherlands: The United Nations' top legal body, the International Court of Justice, on Wednesday gave an advisory opinion saying that Israel is under the obligation to ensure the basic needs of the civilian population in Gaza are met. The panel of 11 judges added Israel has to support relief efforts provided by the United Nations in the Gaza Strip, and U.N. entities, including UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.

AI Brief

The World Court ruled Israel must ensure food, water, shelter, and medical aid for Gaza as an occupying power.
Israel dismissed the ruling, citing concerns over UNRWA's alleged ties to Hamas and denying violations of international law.
Despite a ceasefire deal, aid remains insufficient; the ICJ found Israel used starvation as a weapon, worsening famine conditions.

"As an occupying power, Israel is obliged to ensure the basic needs of the local population, including the supplies essential for their survival," presiding judge Yuji Iwasawa said. He added that basic needs include food, water, shelter, fuel and medical services.

Advisory opinions of the ICJ, also known as the World Court, carry legal and political weight, but they are not binding and the court has no enforcement power.

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres welcomed the advisory opinion and urged Israel "to comply with its obligations" in accordance with the opinion, his spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said in a statement.

"The impact of this Opinion will be decisive to improve the tragic situation in Gaza," Dujarric said.

ISRAEL REJECTS OPINION

The opinion, which was requested by the U.N. General Assembly in December, clarified the protections states must provide for U.N. staff and is expected to have effects beyond the Gaza conflict.

In a post on X, Israel's foreign ministry said it categorically rejected the court's findings and added "Israel fully upholds its obligations under international law".

Israel banned UNRWA from operating in Gaza last year, claiming that some of its employees were members of the armed group Hamas or other affiliated associations.

The ministry said that the United Nations had yet to fully probe the extent of Hamas involvement in UNRWA, and said Israel would not cooperate "with an organization that is infested with terror activities".

The ICJ judges on Wednesday found that Israel had not substantiated its claims that a significant number of UNRWA employees are Hamas members.

In April this year, lawyers for the United Nations and Palestinian representatives at the ICJ accused Israel of breaking international law by refusing to let aid into Gaza between March and May, a time when Israel completely cut off all goods, accusing Hamas fighters of stealing aid.

Since then, some humanitarian aid has been allowed in but U.N. officials say it was nowhere near what was needed to ease a humanitarian disaster which crossed the threshold into famine. A ceasefire agreed this month calls for Israel to admit 600 trucks of aid per day, but the U.N. says far less is entering so far.

The ICJ opinion found Palestinians in Gaza were inadequately supplied and stressed Israel cannot use starvation as a weapon of war.

Paul Reichler, a lawyer acting for the Palestinians, said the findings meant Israel was not complying with its international law obligations.

"On the one hand, you have the court finding that starvation as a method of warfare is illegal, and on the other, the court found that Israel deliberately prevented food from reaching the civilian population in Gaza," he said.

UNRWA, which serves millions of Palestinians by running schools and aid distribution, employs more than 30,000 people.

The U.N. said in August last year that nine UNRWA staff may have been involved in Hamas's October 7, 2023 assault on Israel and had been fired. Israel says another UNRWA employee killed in Gaza in October 2024 was also a Hamas commander.

In an earlier 2024 advisory opinion, the ICJ found that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal and should end immediately. The court also said that Israel had human rights obligations to the Palestinians because of its position as an occupying power.