Azeez Rahim fails in bid to quash 13 charges for corruption, money laundering

This followed High Court Judge Datuk Muhammad Jamil Hussin’s decision in dismissing the application on grounds that all the charges made against Abdul Azeez, 54, were not defective and based on the provisions of law.

“I find the reason given by the applicant (Abdul Azeez) baseless. The applicant also failed to show that the charges made against him were mala fide (malicious).

“In my opinion, this case is not a suitable and appropriate case for the court to exercise its existing power to set aside and quash the charges against the applicant. Therefore, the applicant's application is dismissed,” said the judge.

Judge Muhammad Jamil also said the charges made under the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act against Abdul Azeez, 54, were not flawed even though four separate projects were combined in one charge as the bribes received were in relation to those projects.

"There is no issue of 'duplicity' or 'multiplicity' because it is not a separate offence of accepting bribe for each of the projects. Therefore, there is no breach of Section 163 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) which provides for different charges for every offence committed,” he said.

Meanwhile, for the money laundering offences, Judge Muhammad Jamil said there was no ambiguity as the charge contained details as required by Section 152 and Section 153 of the CPC.

“The charge was not framed with prejudice and the applicant also did not show how he was confused or being prejudiced.

"The lack of details in what form and how the money was received by the applicant, with no mention of the the exact date and place where the offence was committed, which was in the Klang Valley, did not make the charges defective," he added.

Apart from that, the judge said the omission of details (exact date and location) in the charge did not cause the applicant to be confused that he could not submit an appropriate defence.

On the issue of the applicant being investigated over Tabung Haji, but the charge was not related to the board, Judge Muhammad Jamil said it was up to the public prosecutor to initiate prosecution under a law they deemed appropriate.

“Prior to this, as submitted by the deputy public prosecutor, the prosecution had made appropriate amendments to the first to the ninth charges with the permission of the court and without any objection from the counsel representing the applicant in the trial at the Sessions Court.

“The applicant cannot say that the action of the prosecution in amending all the nine charges is unlawful or an abuse of the court process. In whatever circumstances with the permission of the court, the prosecution has the right to amend the charge at any stage of the trial,” he added.

Based on a check on the judicial website, Abdul Azeez's case has been set for hearing before Sessions Court Judge Azura Alwi this Monday (March 15).

Meanwhile, Abdul Azeez’s lawyer, Hamzah Arshad, also informed the court that the defence would appeal against today's decision.

Abdul Azeez was charged with three counts of accepting bribes amounting to RM5.2 million in connection with road projects in Perak and Kedah and 10 counts of money laundering involving a total of RM13.9 million which he allegedly received from Menuju Asas Sdn Bhd.

The offences were allegedly committed at CIMB Bank, Jalan Tun Perak in Kuala Lumpur on Dec 8, 2010 and at Affin Bank, Puchong City Centre, Selangor, on June 13, 2017 and April 10, 2018.

On the money laundering charges, Abdul Azeez was charged with committing the offences in the Klang Valley area between March 8, 2010 and Aug 30, 2018.