In a landmark move in climate policy, the European Union is set to enact a ban on imports linked to deforestation.

This policy aims to protect the world's forests, critical for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions.

However, The New York Times reported that the ban has ignited controversy, particularly among developing nations like Malaysia and Indonesia, which together supply 85 percent of the world's palm oil, one of the commodities affected by the ban.

These countries argue that the law jeopardises their economies and view it as a form of regulatory imperialism imposed by wealthy nations.

Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability Minister Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad was quoted as saying that Malaysia was not questioning the need to fight deforestation.

“But it’s not fair when countries that have deforested their own land for centuries, or are responsible for much of our deforestation, can unilaterally impose conditions on us.” he was quoted in the report.

Critics argue that the EU's ban could be construed as economic protectionism, aimed at shielding European farmers producing competing oilseed crops.

Compliance with the stringent regulations poses significant challenges for small suppliers, potentially leading to their exclusion from the market.

In the report, many small farmers, particularly in regions like Sabah, Malaysia, are unaware of the impending ban and lack the means to prove compliance.

For them, the ban threatens livelihoods and could exacerbate poverty.

The palm oil industry has been instrumental in reducing rural poverty and creating jobs in Malaysia and Indonesia.

However, its expansion has come at the expense of pristine rainforests and peatlands, leading to environmental degradation and habitat loss for endangered species.

Efforts to combat deforestation, despite attempts through voluntary initiatives like the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, have been deemed insufficient by those in Brussels.

However, the task of tracing product origins back to small farms poses significant logistical hurdles, particularly in regions where middlemen wield considerable influence over the supply chain.

While the European Commission has offered assistance to smallholders to ensure compliance with the new regulations, critics argue that the process is burdened with complexities and costs beyond initial expectations.

Malaysia, recognizing the importance of environmental sustainability, has already established its own certification system, which it believes is in line with EU standards. Despite this proactive approach, tensions persist due to the perceived imposition of legislation by more affluent nations.

Therefore, the debate underscores broader issues of global trade and environmental responsibility, highlighting the need for a nuanced approach that balances environmental protection with economic development, particularly in developing nations.