High Court dismisses Petronas application for judicial review to declare Sarawak SST null and void

In making the ruling, High Court Judge Azhahari Kamal Ramli, also awarded costs of RM50,000 to the respondents, which are the Sarawak Comptroller of State Sales Tax and the Sarawak State Government.

He said there was no grounds for the court to grant the declaration as Article 95B (3) of the Federal Constitution which provides that the Legislature of Sabah and Sarawak may also make laws for the imposing of sales tax, and any sales tax imposed in the two states shall be deemed to be among the matters enumerated in the State List and not in the Federal List.

Azhahari Kamal said since Article 95B (3) of the Constitution stated that any sales tax imposed by state law to be deemed among the matters enumerated in the state list, the State Sales Tax Ordinance and any subsidiary legislation made thereunder is constitutional and valid.

"Based on the above reasons, there is no merit in the application for the declaratory relief," he added.

The High Court heard the submissions from the parties involved last Jan 3 and 4 where Petronas as the applicant was represented by counsels Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar and Alvin Chong, while the respondents were represented by the state legal counsel Datuk Seri J C Fong and State Attorney-General Datuk Talat Mahmood Abdul Rashid.

The application, among others, was to seek a declaration from the court that the State Sales Tax (Taxable Goods and Rate of Tax) (Amendment) (No 2) Order 2018, Section 2, 7, 8, 11(1), 12(1), 12(6), 12(7) and 15(d) of the Sarawak Sales Tax Ordinance 1998 and Regulation 19 C, Sarawak State Sales Tax Regulations 1998 were ultra vires the Federal Constitution and thus null and void.

Speaking to reporters outside the court later, Malik Imtiaz said that he would be waiting for further instructions from his clients whether to proceed to appeal against the decision or otherwise.

“We will be studying the grounds of the dismissal before discussing further (on the next course of action) with our client (Petronas) on the matter,” he said.

Meanwhile, Fong said that he hoped that the court’s decision would be accepted by Petronas and it would not proceed to appeal against the judgment.