Key considerations ahead of the 47th ASEAN summit

Beyond a long list of intergovernmental deliverables, it became clear to policy shapers that while the chosen themes are aspirational, the mission has always been about realigning ASEAN’s collective conscience and share principles of mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and a rules-based regional order.

One may explore the extensive details in flagship documents such as the ASEAN Community Vision 2045, which was launched during the 46th ASEAN Summit in Kuala Lumpur. While the resulting resolutions may fill volumes, the core has consistently been anchored in peace, stability, and prosperity.

It is easy for critics to be distracted when, during the 47th ASEAN Summit and Related Summits alone, at least 84 outcome documents will be issued or adopted by ASEAN member states.

These documents will understandably vary in scope, but several are strategic for ASEAN’s policy direction; namely the amendments to the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA), the signing of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement 3.0, the finalisation of the Agreement on Reciprocal Trade (ART) between the United States and selected ASEAN members, and ongoing work to conclude the ASEAN Digital Economy Framework (DEFA) by year-end.

Taken together, these outcomes reflect ASEAN’s commitment to resolving structural constraints that have long impeded regional integration across economic development, trade facilitation, connectivity, and infrastructure. Removing these bottlenecks is essential for ASEAN to position itself as the world’s fourth-largest economy by 2030.

More importantly, the admission of Timor-Leste as ASEAN’s newest and 11th member opens a significant chapter in ASEAN’s 57-year history. Beyond completing the geopolitical map of Southeast Asia, Timor-Leste’s membership has been long-awaited, with Dili having first expressing its intention in the early 2000s. President José Ramos-Horta once remarked that joining ASEAN was “more complex than entering Heaven.”

His frustration is understandable, as ASEAN and its member states have, over many years, extended support to Timor Leste’s development through funding, capacity-building, strategic ventures, and trade integration.

Leading up to Malaysia’s chairmanship, ASEAN leaders had already agreed “in principle” in 2022 to admit Timor-Leste, adopted a detailed accession roadmap in 2023, and operationalised observer participation and technical preparations toward accession by end-October 2025. Although concerns remain about Timor-Leste’s readiness and economic limitations, ASEAN’s values-based and consensus-driven approach approach ultimately prevailed.

Timor-Leste’s accession also reinforces ASEAN Centrality, particularly as the region navigates intensifying US-China rivalry, tariff uncertainty, and ongoing conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, and Myanmar, alongside enduring tensions between Thailand and Cambodia.

Precedences have shown that when ASEAN must speak as one, member states are guided by shared principle, sovereingty and non-alignment. Although the chairmanship rotates annually, Malaysia continues to advocate for the early conclusion of a Code of Conduct in the South China Sea - a process that the Philippines will inherit when it assumes the Chairmanship in January 2026.

ASEAN’s preference for quiet diplomacy, de-escalation and dialogue was again tested during the Thailand–Cambodia border clash, which required engagement with multiple major and regional stakeholders, including the US and China.

ASEAN’s crisis management approach enabled the swift deployment of an Interim Observer Team (IOT) to stabilise the situation and monitor ceasefire arrangements, especially in the provinces of Preah Vihear and Banteay Meanchey. To institutionalise this effort, Malaysia continues to preside over negotiations to establish a full ASEAN Observer Team during the 47th Summit.

Meanwhile, the conflict in Myanmar demands continued attention despite the constraints under the non-interference principle. Throughout Malaysia’s chairmanship, engagement has continued with all relevant parties, including acting President Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, the National Unity Government, and other stakeholders. While the ASEAN Troika mechanisms may remain for harm-reduction and humanitarian coordination, the unavoidable question is whether the Five-Point Consensus requires recalibration to halt ongoing violence.

The 47th Summit is undoubtedly the largest in ASEAN’s history, with participation from new sectoral dialogue partners such as South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, alongside key dialogue partners including US President Donald Trump and Chinese Premier Li Qiang.

Yet, the achievement lies not in the expanded guest list, but in the outward-looking, values-based, and engagement-oriented posture of Malaysia’s chairmanship.

As the 47th Summit concludes on 28 October, there is strong hope that continuity, realism, and principled multilateralism will remain the anchor as Manila assumes the chair next.

---

Hafidzi Razali is a founder and CEO of Strategic Counsel (stcounsel.com), a public affairs and policy communications advisory with network presence in Kuala Lumpur, Singapore and Jakarta.